Legal Opinion
Cooney v. Legg
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 3, 1940No. 1062YPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
I am of the view that the complaint does not disclose justiciable claim, within the jurisdiction of this court.
The plaintiff is a carpenter. He has been employed by the Works Progress Administration in Los Angeles County, California, under various classifications. The maximum total compensation which he could receive from July 1, 1940, to June 30, 1941, the date to which the Works Progress Administration has been extended, is $1,-076.40.
Should he be given the highest classification, his maximum earnings could not exceed $1,138.80 for the period.
The plaintiff states…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- William Jameson & Co. v. MorgenthauSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Allen v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Odis R. Van Buskirk v. Fred T. Wilkinson, as Warden of the United States Penitentiary, McNeil Island, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Osage Tribe of Indians v. IckesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
- Harvey v. EarlyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Stone v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1940
- Koster v. TurchiDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.