Legal Opinion

Duchesne County v. State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1943No. 6562PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Appeal from the District Court of Duchesne County. Hereinafter, respondents, plaintiffs below, will be referred to as the 'County, and appellants, defendants below, will be called the Tax Commission. The action involved the constitutionality and meaning of Section 80-2-1, U. C. A. 1943 (R. S. U. 1933) and the construction and interpretation of Art. 13, Section 2, Constitution of the State of Utah. These constructions are basic in the consideration of the question presented to the trial court and raised on this appeal — Are lands title to which are in the State, and which were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Mower v. Inhabitants of LeicesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  4. Harrington v. PierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Riddoch v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. National Parks & Conservation Ass'n v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Sakezzie v. Utah State Indian Affairs CommissionDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1963
  5. Sundquist v. SundquistUtah Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API