Legal Opinion

Sakezzie v. Utah State Indian Affairs Commission

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 7, 1963No. C 55-61PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

This case in its present post-judgment phase presents further problems in relation to the defendant Commission’s statutory duty with reference to a fund entrusted to the State of Utah by Congress from oil royalties from leased land in the so-called Aneth Extension of the Navajo Indian Reservation on condition that it be expended for designated purposes “or for the benefit of the Indians residing therein”. Public Law No. 403, 47 Stat. 1418; Chapter 22, Title 63, Utah Code Annotated, 1953. 1

The plaintiffs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2202, 2 have…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Wayne S. Marteney v. United States of America, C. M. Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. State Ex Rel. Caldwell v. Hooker, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Ash Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pelt v. UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
  3. United States v. JimSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jack Siegel v. William E. Bookhultz & Sons, Inc., St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Pelt v. State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API