Legal Opinion

Creamer v. McIlvain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 20, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas (Harlan, C. JO

1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.

The appellants sued the appellees for injuries sustained by Mrs. Creamer as the result of the horses, drawing a vehicle occupied by the appellees, running into one in which the appellants were riding. There are two counts in the declaration — -the first alleging that “ the defendants, because of their negligence and incompetency to properly drive horses, so negligently and unskilfully managed a team, by which they were being conveyed in the same direction, that said team struck the vehicle in which the plaintiffs were seated,” and the second, that “a vehicle under the management of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Benoit v. . Troy Lansingburgh R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Buckley v. LeonardNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Arnold v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  4. O'Brien v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rowe v. SuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Benke v. SteppSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Webber v. McDonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Troop a Riding Academy v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Luks v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API