Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Halpern
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1982No. Civ. 63195PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LA VINE, J. *
The husband (hereinafter called Paul) appeals portions of an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage adjudging that he is not the father of a minor child, Laurie, and that reasonable visitation is denied him. Pursuant to stipulation in court, the trial court had found that Paul is not the biological father of Laurie; and that since it is not in the best interests of Laurie that Paul shall visit her, he is denied visitation rights because Paul is a nonparent and that future conflicts may arise if he were granted visitation.
Issues
1. Whether the trial court has…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Detrich v. Carolyn B.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Gardiner v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- In Re Marriage of ValleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of SillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re the Marriage of HiginbothamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Simmons v. ComerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Peery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Marckwardt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.