Mitchell v. Lemmie, 21511 (10-26-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Larry Mitchell appeals from a judgment against him on his employment discrimination claim, and in favor of defendants-appellees Valerie Lemmie and the City of Dayton (Dayton), based on a directed verdict granted at the conclusion of Mitchell's case in chief. The trial court concluded that there was no direct evidence of discrimination. In addition, the court found that Mitchell failed to establish two of the prongs required for a prima facie case of discrimination, and failed to prove that Dayton's reason for the hiring decision was pretextual. Finally, the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glemaud v. MetroHealth Sys.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Martin v. Block Communications, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Hauser v. Dayton Police Dept.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bear v. BearOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Jones v. Unican Ohio, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.