Legal Opinion

Guardianship of Linda

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 7, 1988PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.

The Department of Mental Health (department) filed a petition in the Probate Court under G. L. c. 201, § 6 (1986 ed.), seeking a guardianship of “Linda” (the ward), with authority in the guardian to permit the administration of antipsychotic drugs. At the time this action was commenced, the ward voluntarily was accepting such drugs. The Probate Court judge ruled that, by reason of mental illness, the ward was unable to make an informed judgment as to treatment. He appointed a guardian, with authority to permit the administration of antipsychotic drugs for only so long as the ward voluntarily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Guardianship of RoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Rubie Rogers, and Cross-Appellants v. Robert Okin, M.D., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  4. Rogers v. Commissioner of the Department of Mental HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Steele v. Hamilton County Community Mental Health BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Guardianship of DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. O'SULLIVAN v. Secretary of Human ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Adoption of GretaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Guardianship of WeedonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API