Steele v. Hamilton County Community Mental Health Board
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The issue in this case is whether a probate court must find that an involuntarily committed mentally ill person is a danger to himself/herself or others before the court may issue an order permitting employees of the commitment facility to administer antipsychotic medication to the patient against his/her wishes. For the reasons that follow, we find that a court may issue an order permitting the administration of antipsychotic medication4 against a patient’s wishes without a finding that the patient is dangerous when the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the patient lacks the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Riggins v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. MuncieOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HaydenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. HaydenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Myers v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.