Legal Opinion

Odell Knoshaug and Merrill Knoshaug v. Harold Arnold Pollman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1957No. 15724PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants brought this action to set aside and have declared null and void a certain deed to 8 mineral acres executed by them and given to the defendant-appellee as a contingent fee for legal services. Motion for summary judgment by the appellee was granted. This appeal followed.

Suit was originally commenced in the State District Court of North Dakota. Diversity of citizenship and the requisite amount prompted removal to the federal court.

From the pleadings and the depositions of the two appellants, the following facts, which formed the basis for the trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fedorenko v. RudmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bauer v. National Union Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Kramer v. K. O. Lee & Son Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Daniel v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Knoshaug v. PollmanDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dugan v. First Nat'l Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Dugan v. First Nat'l Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API