Legal Opinion

Liles v. Charles Lee Byrd Logging Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 9, 1983No. 673PA82PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The question for decision is whether two scars around plaintiffs knee constitute “serious bodily disfigurement” and thus are compensable disfigurements under N.C.G.S. § 97-31(22) (1979). We hold that, under the facts of this case, these scars are not compensable disfigurements.

I

During the hearing conducted to determine if his scars were compensable disfigurements, plaintiff, Rickey Liles, testified as follows:

He was working for the Charles Lee Byrd Logging Co. when, in the course of cutting down a tree with a chain saw, he cut himself. This injury required stitches, and, as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Cates v. Hunt Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Marshburn v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grant v. Burlington Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Blackwell v. Multi Foods Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Anderson v. Shoney's of MorgantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Clark v. Estes Express LinesNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008
  5. Everette v. Blythe Development Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API