Legal Opinion
Baca v. Sklar
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 16, 2005No. 04-2010PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
After accusing his employer, the University of New Mexico (“University”), of engaging in illegal financial dealings with the state Department of Health (“DOH”), Patrick Baca allegedly endured a campaign of retaliation culminating in his resignation. Baca sued the University and Dr. David Sklar, his supervisor, claiming First Amendment retaliation and discrimination based on ethnicity. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on all claims. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM the district court’s grant of summary judgment…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PVNF, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- James v. WadasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter AcademyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Swackhammer v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Leverington v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.