Rodgers v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
An arbitrator awarded appellant Victoria J. Rodgers compensation for all her alleged medical expenses. The district court reduced the award, concluding that the Minnesota no-fault automobile insurance act requires the insurer to pay for only those medical expenses that arise from the accident and not those that arise from preexisting injuries from a prior accident. We affirm.
FACTS
In February 1991, appellant Rodgers was involved in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident, Rodgers was insured under an automobile insurance policy with Progressive Specialty…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- City of St. Louis Park v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Sundquist v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SpartzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Great West Casualty Co. v. Northland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Pususta v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Loza v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Great West Casualty Co. v. Northland InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.