Kirkeby v. Covenant House
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.
This appeal and cross-appeal arise from an unusually convoluted probate dispute. The central issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in determining that the testator’s 1992 will was invalid because it was not acknowledged “in the presence” of witnesses. ORS 112.235(l)(c). The primary, albeit not exclusive, issue on cross-appeal is whether the court erred in determining that a statutory election, ORS 114.105, signed by the testator’s husband but not filed until after the husband had himself died, was ineffective. We conclude that the trial court correctly resolved those and other…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Luper v. WertsOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Flanders v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re Demaris' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Estate of ShaffOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Loomis v. MacFarlaneOregon Supreme Court · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walker v. RoberdsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002