Legal Opinion

Rivers v. Weems

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1952No. 17769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

It is contended that the judgment complained of is error for the reason that the plaintiff in error is entitled to recover under the provisions of Code § 105-1101, which reads as follows: “Any person who knowingly or carelessly sells to another unwholesome provisions of any kind, the defect being unknown to the purchaser, by the use of which damage results to the purchaser or his family, shall be liable in damages for such injury.” It will be noted that this Code section contains the langauge, “the defect being unknown to the purchaser.” In applying this rule of law, the Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andrews & Co. v. KinselSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Keiley v. BristolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. City of Atlanta v. GuiceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Warner v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Gulf Oil Corporation v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  3. Blakely v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. Metropolitan Transit System, Inc. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Metropolitan Transit System, Inc. v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API