City of Atlanta v. Guice
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Reluctant as we are to disagree with the learned judge of the trial bench, we are constrained to the view that the petition failed to set forth a cause of action. Assuming that the condition of the embankment as described in the petition was such as to imply negligence on the part of the city with respect to the safety of the sidewalk as a place of travel, our opinion is that under the allegations made, the act of one of the children in going upon the embankment and causing stones to cave off and strike the plaintiff’s son should be accounted as the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Andrews & Co. v. KinselSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. TapleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Gillespie v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Kleinberg v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corporation v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Rivers v. WeemsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Lee v. Georgia Forest Products Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932