Legal Opinion

Keiley v. Bristol

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1923No. 14134PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A cause of action for injuries sustained in drinking poisonous and deleterious liquors fui’nished by another may arise either from the wilful and intentional furnishing of such liquor or from the negligent and careless furnishing of the same. A petition, therefore, which alleges a right of action to recover upon the theory that the liquor was wilfully and intentionally furnished to the plaintiff is amendable by the addition of another count, alleging a right of action in the plaintiff to recover for the negligent and careless furnishing of such liquor. Such an amendment does not set out a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Metropolitan Street Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Dundee Woolen Mills v. EdisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. FlyntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foster v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Cordell v. Macon Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  3. Dodd v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. McKenzie v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Rivers v. WeemsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API