Legal Opinion

(PS) Schmitz v. Asman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 8, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00195Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al,, No. 2:20-cv-00195-DJC-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 ADAM ASMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Dianne Mallia and Thomas Schmitz proceed without counsel under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. The motion presently before the court is filed by defendants Adams, Andaluz, Ashe, 19 Asman, Branman, Brizendine, Brockenborogh, Ceballos, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson, 20 Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart, Robinson, Rudas, M. Smith, C. Smith, Tebrock, Toche, and 21 Waine. (ECF No. 346.) The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RicheyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Chico Scrap Metal, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. Ramirez v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API