Legal Opinion

Hertz Driv-Ur-Self Stations Inc. v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 21, 1951No. 33657PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

Under the rule that the testimony of a party who offers himself as a witness in his own behalf is to be construed most strongly against him when it is self-contradictory, vague, or equivocal, the plaintiff’s own evidence (including letters written by the plaintiff, which were introduced in evidence by him) as to the authority of the defendant in fi. fa. to sell the trucks, defeated his right of recovery against the claimant, who, under the facts stipulated, was a bona fide purchaser without notice of any understanding between the plaintiff, the defendant,. and the plaintiff’s attorney. Hogan…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clarke Bros. v. McNattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. National City Bank v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Hogan v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  4. Gernazian v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Tucker v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dealers' Discount Corp. v. TrammellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API