Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Mann

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Trover. Before Judge Reagan. Henry superior court. April' 86, 1905.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

A executed and delivered to B a promissory note which contained •a clause conveying to B the title to a certain mule as security. B had the note recorded in the county of A’s residence. Before the note was fully paid, B authorized A to sell the animal and to turn the proceeds *1004of tlie sale over to him. A sold the mule to D, against whom B then brought an action of trover to recover the animal. Upon the trial the court charged: “If you believe from the evidence that plaintiff . . gave . . the maker of the note permission to sell the mule sued for, coupled with the condition that [A] was to pay…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Guill v. NorthernSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clarke Bros. v. McNattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Daggett v. CornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Okl. Cattle Loan Co. v. Wright MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Seymour v. Standard Live Stock Commission Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Armistead v. WeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API