Legal Opinion

Hall v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided December 7, 2017No. 20150459-CAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORTENSEN, Judge:

¶1 Since 1965, David L. Peterson, individually and through his trust, has owned a large tract of recreational mountain property east of Mount Pleasant in Sanpete County. 1 Part of the property is known as Buckhom Flats. Between 2010 and 2013, Kyle R. Hall purchased four lots near Buckhorn Flats, A dirt road (the Peterson Road) crosses Buckhom Flats and is the only access to another road (the Spur Road) that leads to Hall’s four lots. When Peterson would not allow access across Buckhorn Flats using the Peterson Road, Hall 'sued. At trial, the jury found that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Storms v. TuckTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. B.R. v. WestUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Mahmood v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arreguin-Leon v. Hadco ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. South Weber v. CobblestoneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  3. Jenco v. Ledges PartnersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023
  4. South Weber v. CobblestoneCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  5. Utah Stream v. VR AcquisitionsUtah Supreme Court · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API