Legal Opinion

Rice v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 3, 1925No. 4597PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCAMANT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is well settled that when a defendant is convicted on more than one count, and separate sentences of imprisonment are imposed, these sentences will run • concurrently, unless provision is made to the contrary in the judgment order. It has also been held repeatedly ‘that the judgment order should indicate the sequence in which.the terms of imprisonment are to he served. The authorities cited by-appellant sustain his contentions in these respects, but appellees contend that the sentence imposed in this ease is effective in imposing two successive terms of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  2. United States v. PattersonUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  3. Haussener v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. In Re De BaraSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Dever v. CornwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Levine v. HudspethCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Boyd v. ArcherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  3. Buie v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. In Re PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Copher v. BarbeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API