Legal Opinion
In Re De Bara
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 3, 1900No. 15, OriginalPublishedCited by 36 opinions
ORIGINAL. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKenna
Upon filing the petition in this case a rule to show cause was issued to John L. M. Donell, Superintendent of the House of Correction, at Detroit, Michigan, by whom it is alleged the petitioner is illegally.restrained of his liberty.
The petition shows that the petitioner was convicted in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, upon the charge of violating section 5480 of the Revised Statutes of the United Statés, which prohibits the use of the mails for fraudulent purposes, and that on June 17, 1899, he was sentenced as follows:
“ Came the parties by théir…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Manhattan Bank of Memphis v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
3Cited by36 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Carter v. McClaughrySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Freeman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.