Legal Opinion
Pollard v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARBIERI, Senior Judge.
Barry Pollard, (Claimant), seeks review here of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), entered after granting a rehearing and reversing its and a referee’s prior decision and order which granted compensation to Claimant, the resulting disallowance being based on a determination by the Board on the rehearing that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 602.
Claimant gave his age as 44 at a hearing held on October 9, 1984,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- McDevitt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bevilacqua v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brooks v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Clowes v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Bond v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Refiners Transport & Terminal v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.