Legal Opinion

O'Bryan v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 26, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

These appeals present the question whether the City of Louisville may operate a zoo pursuant to plans it has adopted. The Jefferson Circuit Court sustained the validity of the city’s proposed zoo operation. In these consolidated appeals, taxpayers challenge the judgment, asserting two bases for reversal: (1) Louisville is not authorized to operate a zoo; (2) even if it may operate a zoo, the method proposed is illegal as vio-lative of constitutional provisions.

The parties stipulated the facts. Pursuant to resolution of Louisville’s Board of Aldermen, dated January 23,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Associated Industries of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
  2. Board of Trustees House of Reform v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. City of Covington v. O. F. Moore Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  4. City of Cleveland v. LauscheOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Williams v. Estill CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Persons v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API