Legal Opinion
Bowles v. Dairymen's League Co-op. Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 22, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
Plaintiff, having commenced an action by a complaint alleging violations of Maximum Price Regulation 280 (7 F.R. 10144; 8 F.R. 16795; 9 F.R. 1622), and Regional Order G-l (9 F.R. 2714; 9 F.R. 3618; 9 F.R. 7590), and praying for injunctive relief against all the defendants and a judgment for treble damages against defendant Dairymen’s, now moves for an interlocutory injunction. Section 205(a), Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 925(a).
The commodity which is the subject of this suit is fluid milk. The commerce in this commodity is an arena in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Corn Products Refining Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Bowles v. American Brewery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blair v. GettingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- United States v. TantleffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Blair v. GettingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1952