Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1971No. 46186PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

1. Plaintiff alleged that a justiciable controversy existed, and that the court should take jurisdiction of such controversy and declare the rights and legal relations of the parties so that the plaintiff might be relieved from uncertainty and insecurity in respect to its rights, status and future conduct. While some of the defendants to this action admitted these allegations, the defendants Katrina and Ralph Jones in their answer denied the same. See Section 8 (b) of the Civil Practice Act (Code Ann. § 81A-108 (b); Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 619; 1967, pp. 226, 230).

2. As movant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pinkard v. MendelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Gant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Kiker v. HefnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  5. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Cotton v. Bank South, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. LabMD, Inc. v. Admiral InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Southeast Service Corp. v. Savannah Teachers Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Labmd, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API