Legal Opinion

Gant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1964No. 40519PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The salient issue in this appeal is whether the rights of the petitioning insurance company have already accrued. Notwithstanding the remedial nature of the Declaratory Judgments Act and the 1959 liberalizing amendment (Ga. L. 1959, p. 236), the rule is that a petition does not state a cause of action for a declaratory judgment where “the rights of the parties have already accrued” and there is no necessity to protect and guide petitioner “from uncertainty and insecurity with respect to the propriety of some future act or conduct.” Holcomb v. Bivens, 103 Ga. App. 86 (118 SE2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Jones v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  4. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Holcomb v. BivensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Richmond v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Hoover v. Maxum Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Prescott's Altama Datsun, Inc. v. Monarch InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. LaSalle National Insurance v. PophamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. Metro Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API