Legal Opinion

Deville v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 28, 2006No. 2801042PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. ARTHUR KELSEY, Judge.

Charles Deandre Deville appeals his conviction of conspiring to commit grand larceny by false pretenses. He was denied a fair trial, Deville argues, because the Commonwealth failed to disclose exculpatory information required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). The trial judge who presided over Deville’s bench trial found that, even if the disclosure had been made earlier, no prejudice could be shown because there was no possibility the outcome of the trial would have been any different. Finding this determination reasonable, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Kelly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2003
  4. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  5. Correll v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kirby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  2. Johnson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  3. Wright v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
  4. Bly v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. Coley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API