Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Cameron

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from chancery court of Jefferson county. Ellis, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Simrall, J.:

Bernard Hyman complains in this court, of the decision of the chancery court, sustaining a demurrer to his bill of intervention, and dismissing it. This is the state of the pleadings: Henry C. Lindsay brought his bill in chancery against Duncan, Burch, Cameron and Mrs. M. J. Wade, in which he alleges, that, in 1861, he bought at the sale under probate decree, made by Robert Duncan, the administrator of S. B. Owens, deceased, a parcel of real estate in the town of Fayette, with John H. Duncan and Burch his sureties on the bonds for the purchase-money; and, in order to indemnify his…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Potlatch Lumber Co. v. RunkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. BANKERS'MORTG. CO. OF TOPEKA, KAN. v. McCombCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Faricy v. St. Paul Investment & Savings SocietySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Arn v. ArnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Shoemake v. Federal Credit Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API