Legal Opinion

Shoemake v. Federal Credit Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1940No. 33758PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court on suggestion of error.

The judgment of the court below was reversed on a former day, but on the coming in of a suggestion of error, that judgment was set aside, the opinion then rendered was withdrawn and the case was submitted to the Court in banc. The record discloses that Hurst purchased an automobile from the Cooley Motor Company on credit, executing several promissory notes therefor; the seller reserving title therein to the automobile until the notes were paid, with the right to repossess it on the failure of Hurst to pay the notes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  2. Hyman v. CameronMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Ellison v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Crystal Springs Bank v. New Orleans Cattle Loan Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Long v. McKinneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lopez v. HollemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Dillon v. Allen-Parker Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Douglas Long v. Lori McKinneyMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API