Legal Opinion
Stotler and Company and Richard C. Allen v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 25, 1988No. 86-2695PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Stotler and Company (“Stotler”) petitions this court to review an order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“the Commission”) finding Stotler, a futures trading house, vicariously liable under the Commodity Exchange Act’s (the Act’s) 1 an-tifraud provisions for the actions of Richard Allen, a commodity trading advisor and pool operator, in soliciting accounts he traded through Stotler. The Commission also found that Stotler violated one of the Act’s registration provisions by not registering Allen as an “associated person.” Having taken a fresh look at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Joseph P. Cange v. Stotler and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Rosenthal & Company v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. British American Commodity Options Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. International Financial Services (New York), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Stuart N. Gimbel v. Commodity Futures Trading CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Gibraltar Monetary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. McDonnellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- In Re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.