Legal Opinion

State v. Spring

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 20, 2018No. AC39628PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBright, J.

The primary issue in this appeal involves the admissibility at trial of the defendant's written statement, which was made during an unrecorded custodial interrogation at the Enfield police station. The defendant, Christopher M. Spring, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of strangulation in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-64bb (a) and assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-61 (a) (1). 1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court erred when it granted the state's motion to admit his statement, which…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Christopher S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  2. State v. SpringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. State v. Christopher S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API