Legal Opinion

St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. McGrath

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRasburt, J.

Appellees sued appellant in the court below for the value of their residence and certain household furniture and appurtenances of the alleged value of §937.60. It was charged that the house and contents were destroyed by fire set by sparks from an engine in use on defendant’s road, resulting from the fact that the engine was improperly and defectively built and constructed and carelessly and negligently managed by appellant. Appellee alternatively alleged that one Mitchell, or Mitchell-Critten-den Tie Company, with the consent and knowledge of appellant, in like manner operated said engine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. CulbersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texas Interurban Ry. Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Trinity Valdey & N. Ry. Co. v. ScholzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. ToomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. Arey v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API