Legal Opinion

East Line & Red River Railway Co. v. Culberson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1888No. 2558PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from Camp. Tried below before Hon. W. P. McLean.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

W. A. Culberson while operating a train upon the road of the appellant company as conductor lost his life in endeavoring to make a coupling between the engine under his control and a train in its front. The appellee, who was his wife, brought this suit on behalf of herself and other beneficiaries to recover damages under the statute for the injury. She alleged that the accident resulted from a defect in the engine and the incompetence and carelessness of the engineer.

*377During the progress of the trial the defendant offered to prove by a witness that at the time of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Clark v. Mayor, Aldermen, and Common Council of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Railroad Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. New York & Maryland Line R. Co. v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Central & Montgomery Railroad v. Morris & CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GayTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Cobb v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893
  5. Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API