Legal Opinion

State v. Medina

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1988No. 86-1079PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant, David L. Medina, appeals from the district court for Hall County, which affirmed a decision of the county court for that county. Defendant was charged in county court in two counts. After trial in the county court, a jury found defendant not guilty of driving while under the influence of alcohol, and guilty of refusing to submit to a chemical test, pursuant to the implied consent law, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.08 (Reissue 1984). Defendant timely appealed. We affirm.

The evidence shows that defendant had been to the horseraces in Grand Island, Nebraska, on the afternoon of March 7,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wohlgemuth v. PearsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. BartholomewNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. HarrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RinckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Craig v. DyeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. State v. BroussardNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BoydNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API