Legal Opinion

Yezovich v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1992No. 2401 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Stephen Yezovich (Claimant) seeks review of the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s decision granting USX Corporation’s (Employer) petition for termination which was treated as a petition for modification under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act). 1 For the reasons stated below, the Board’s order is affirmed.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his right wrist on January 4, 1981 and was thereafter paid worker’s compensation pursuant to an agreement dated April 3,1981. On February 23, 1987, Employer filed a petition…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CejaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McCray v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Hutter v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Frontini v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Rite Care Resources v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API