Legal Opinion

Arnstein v. Broadcast Music, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 30, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRIGHT, District Judge.

This is an action brought for the alleged infringement by the defendants of nine songs claimed to have been composed by the plaintiff. The complaint was framed in nine causes of action. The fifth, seventh and eighth causes of action were dismissed upon the trial because plaintiff failed to prove any copyright. Boucicault v. Hart, Fed.Cas.No. 1,692; Cohan v. Richmond, 2 Cir., 86 F.2d 680. The ninth cause of action was dismissed because plaintiff failed to prove that the accused song, “The White Cliffs of Dover” had ever been published, broadcasted, recorded or publicized…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. Edward B. Marks Music CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Cohan v. RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Marks v. Leo Feist, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Carew v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  5. Arnstein v. Edward B. Marks Music CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Jarvis v. a & M RECORDSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  3. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Gingg v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API