Legal Opinion

Arnstein v. Edward B. Marks Music Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 10, 1936No. 253PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This is the usual bill in equity upon the infringement of a musical copyright; the plaintiff’s right is admitted and the sole issue is as to the infringement. The plaintiff’s case depends upon access and similarity; the defendant answers by showing that the common parts of the two pieces have occurred elsewhere and by the denials of the persons charged with the piracy. The issue being one of fact, the plaintiff starts with the finding against him of a trial judge, who saw all but one of the witnesses, and whose decision we should accept unless it is plainly wrong.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Hein v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Louis Gaste and Les Editions Louis Gaste v. Morris Kaiserman A/K/A Morris Albert, and Fermata International Melodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Ronald H. Selle v. Barry Gibb, and Ronald H. Selle v. Barry GibbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Johnson v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API