Legal Opinion

Letzig v. Rupert

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1972No. 46,312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Owsley, J.:

This is an action for damages caused by the misrepresentation, fraud, and deceit of the defendant. The trial court sustained a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant on the grounds that the plaintiffs’ causes of action were premature.

The controversy centers around Form 319A “Option Agreement— Flat Payment,” whereby each of the plaintiffs purchased property located in Wyandotte County, Kansas, from the defendant, Juanita R. Rupert, through her agent, Lloyd R. Wallace. It is conceded that each of the parties plaintiff signed the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. FrazierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Drollinger v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Fourth National Bank v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Ditzen v. GivenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Stevens v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jackson & Scherer, Inc. v. WashburnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Hawthorn-Mellody, Inc. v. DriessenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Koerner v. Custom Components, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  4. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Fleming Companies, Inc. v. Equitable Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API