Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. Watkins

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1984No. 47961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Cleveland Municipal Court granting a directed verdict to defendant-appellee, Roselee Watkins, and against plaintiff-appellant Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority’s (CMHA) action for forcible entry and detainer. The court found that the agreement between the parties was not a lease but rather a land installment contract. The vendor of a land installment contract may recover possession of his property only by use of a proceeding for foreclosure and judicial sale provided that the vendee has paid in accordance with the contract terms for five years or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Swanson v. SwansonOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Central Realty Co. v. ClutterOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Drake v. MenczerOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Ditzen v. GivenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Stevens v. McDowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flint v. HolbrookOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re JohnsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  3. In Re KratzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  4. Am. Servicing Corp. v. WannemacherOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Ayers v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API