Legal Opinion

McElhaney v. Cox

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1975No. 74-344PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellants contend that the chancery court erred in allowing attorneys’ fees of $275.00 to appellees’ attorneys from the proceeds of a partition sale in this case. The action was commenced by a petition of appellees Virgil Cox and Clara Armstrong to quiet the title to the lands involved in them. Appellants Ella Cox McElhaney and Pearl Reeves answered and counterclaimed, alleging that they were tenants in common with appellees and that the property was not susceptible of division in kind, and asking that the lands be sold in partition, that the court award Ella Cox…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. BridwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. American Bonding Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Summerville v. North Platte Valley Weather Control DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Eddie v. EddieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Rahat v. GolmirzaieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Swinson v. JarrattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API