Legal Opinion

Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Employment Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2003No. 96-T-0123A; A110993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*581BREWER, P. J.

In this proceeding for judicial review of an Employment Department (department) order affirming an unemployment tax assessment, petitioner seeks an award of attorney fees and costs under ORS 183.497(l)(a) and (b). We deny that request.

This is petitioner’s second petition for judicial review of a department order determining that pharmacists who contract with petitioner are employees for whom petitioner must pay unemployment tax. We take part of the procedural history of the case from our opinion on the merits of the second petition for judicial review:

“Petitioner provides relief…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. McKean-Coffman v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Johnson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Gasp v. EqcCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. KAIB'S ROVING v. Employment Dept.Oregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Kaib's Roving R.Ph. Agency, Inc. v. Employment DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API