Legal Opinion

G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2008No. 000909349; A132835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The Oregon Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) (respondents1) appeal from a supplemental judgment awarding petitioners, various environmental groups and individuals, a portion of the costs and attorney fees that they incurred in disputing the provisions of a hazardous waste permit authorizing the construction and operation of an incineration facility to dispose of chemical weapons stored at the Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal Facility. Specifically, respondents challenge the award of fees on the alternative grounds that the circuit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Norden v. STATE, WATER RESOURCES DEPT.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Palen v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Central Lincoln PUD v. Dept. of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Gasp v. EqcCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Wright v. PERSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API