Legal Opinion

McAlister v. Essex Property Trust

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 24, 2007No. CV070240SJOSHXPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PARTIAL SUMMARY ADJUDICATION ON THE ISSUE OF REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION

OTERO, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication, filed May 14, 2007. Defendants filed an Opposition, to which Plaintiffs replied. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Local Rule 7-15, the Court found this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for June 4, 2007. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

I.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Southwest Airlines Company v. Texas International Airlines, Inc. v. Texas Aeronautics Commission, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Recht Family PartnershipDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  2. In Re Fedex Ground Pckg. Sys., Inc., Emp. Practices Lit.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  3. Escamilla v. Echelon Communities, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Escamilla v. Echelon Communities, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API