In re T.W.R.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
After the State claimed that two of her children were children in need of aid and took custody of them, T.R. (the mother) underwent parenting education. When the State concluded that her progress was inadequate, the superior court allowed the State to take custody of the third child, and ultimately terminated T.R.’s parental rights as to all three children. T.R. now appeals. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
At the center of this case are three boys: J.P.M., born June 2, 1985; T.W.R., born August 25, 1988; and P.S.R., born April 11, 1991. R.R. is the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Matter of K.L.J.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Evans v. EvansAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- K.F. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- N.A. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Jude M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Matter of SAAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- V.S.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Reichmann v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.