Legal Opinion

Reichmann v. State, Department of Natural Resources

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1996No. S-6664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Margaret Reichmann applied for a preference right to purchase a five-acre tract of land from the State. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) denied her request. Reichmann now appeals that denial. She contends that the DNR’s decision was based on an invalid regulation, violated her right to equal protection of the laws, and constituted an abuse of discretion.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In 1957 Herman Reichmann placed a cabin on a tract of land on the north end of Summit Lake. In November of that year, Vestaine Reichmann, Mr. Reichmann’s first wife,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kenai Peninsula Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Trustees for Alaska v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Alaska Fish Spotters Ass'n v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API