Reichmann v. State, Department of Natural Resources
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Margaret Reichmann applied for a preference right to purchase a five-acre tract of land from the State. The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) denied her request. Reichmann now appeals that denial. She contends that the DNR’s decision was based on an invalid regulation, violated her right to equal protection of the laws, and constituted an abuse of discretion.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In 1957 Herman Reichmann placed a cabin on a tract of land on the north end of Summit Lake. In November of that year, Vestaine Reichmann, Mr. Reichmann’s first wife,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilbert v. State, Department of Fish & Game, Board of FisheriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Kenai Peninsula Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Trustees for Alaska v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Alaska Fish Spotters Ass'n v. State, Department of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Baxley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SchmidtAlaska Supreme Court · 2014