Legal Opinion
State v. Cromlish
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 13, 2001No. 98-254PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, J.,
retired, specially assigned under RSA 490:3. The defendant, Richard Cromlish, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (Lynn, J.) of second degree murder. See RSA 630:l-b, 1(a) (1996). On appeal, the defendant contends the trial court erred in denying him the ability to retain and call an expert witness at trial. We affirm.
Based on the evidence adduced at trial, the jury could have found the following facts. The defendant was working as a taxi cab driver and went to pick up a night-time fare on February 14, 1997, at a Manchester club. Shortly after the defendant arrived,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Cornelious Perry v. Ruth L. RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wong v. EkbergSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. BeltonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. Max WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- State v. HearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- State v. Ke Tong ChenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.