Legal Opinion

Dean v. Game

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1917No. Civ. No. 1998Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Respondent in this action executed his negotiable promissory note for the sum of $530.31, payable to the order of one D. J. Gregor ten days after its date, which said note was indorsed by one P. T. Brunsing, and was thereafter and before maturity indorsed and transferred by the payee thereof to one John F. Smith, who paid to said Gregor the. sum of five hundred dollars. The real transaction- between the original parties to the note was this: It was agreed between Game, Gregor, and Brunsing that Game was to execute and Brunsing indorse said note to Gregor, who was to negotiate the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eames v. CrosierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Sinkler v. SiljanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Bank of Sonoma County v. GoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. O'Conor v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API