Legal Opinion

O'Conor v. Clarke

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1896No. L. A. No. 11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, San Diego County; George Puterbaugh, Judge. Action by Andrew J. 0 ’Conor, receiver of the Consolidated National Bank of San Diego, against W. H. Clarke and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Frank A. Kimball appeals.

1Per curiam

This is an action upon a bill of exchange, and the material facts of the case are as follows: On August 12, 1890, Livingston, Clarke & Co. drew the said bill of exchange on the Pacific Hardware Company, payable to their own order ninety days after date; and on the twenty-seventh day of that month the same was accepted by the drawee, “payable at office Sather Banking Company, San Francisco, Calif. ’ ’ Thereafter, and before the maturity thereof, the defendants W. H. Clarke, Frank A. Kimball, Sidney Selover, and J. B. Livingston indorsed the said bill of exchange, to enable the drawers to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. UrquidasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Harralson v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. O'Rourke v. VennekohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hulsman v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Clark v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Navajo County Bank v. DolsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dean v. GameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API