Legal Opinion
De Anza Land & Leisure Corp. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 4, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 5538Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
The basic issue raised by this appeal is whether successive judgment renewals have always been effective in Arizona. Facts necessary to determine this issue and certain collateral issues are as follows.
*538In the action below appellee De Anza Land and Leisure Company (De Anza) claimed an interest in monies due on a promissory note from Ray Development Company to Capitol Coal and Coke Company by virtue of assignment of the note to De Anza. The note and the security given for it included a mortgage on real estate in Yavapai County referred to as the “Wine Glass Mortgage.” The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Madrigal v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Coggins v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Jackson v. Northland Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Cagle v. ButcherArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Nowels v. BergstedtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.